Search for: "Jurek v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:22 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:46 am
"And:In July 1976, little more than six months after taking his seat, Justice Stevens announced the opinion for the court in Jurek v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:30 am
"Lowenfield relies on Jurek v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976) had a defined list of statutory mitigating circumstances to be weighed, and the Texas law approved in Jurek v. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
As the State's opposition in Brewer correctly notes, there is a dynamic tension between the cornerstone of Texas capital jurisprudence, Jurek v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
In the 1976 case of Jurek v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
George Stephanopoulos of ABC News reports on his interview with the Justice, who told Stephanopoulos that he regrets his vote to reinstate the death penalty in the 1976 case Jurek v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
That same year, both Texas' statute ( Jurek v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
That same year, both Texas’ statute ( Jurek v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:06 pm
" In Kentucky, Jurek v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 am
Florida, Jurek v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:12 am
Supreme Court decision in Jurek v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:47 am
More on on Jurek v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:26 am
As with many old Texas cases, the state is still litigating in Hood the consequences of instructing juries in accordance with a statute the Supreme Court expressly upheld in Jurek v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Florida, Jurek v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:42 pm
” The Kentucky case of Jurek v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
United States and its progeny? [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:30 am
” At one of our many meetings with the Justice during that Term, the Justice said that if he were able to change his vote in any one case, it would be Jurek v. [read post]
