Search for: "Juri v. Juri"
Results 481 - 500
of 50,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 10:28 am
The jury awarded $2.9 million in compensatory damages to the plaintiff in Snyder v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:05 am
Supreme Court ruled back in 1968 in Duncan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:04 pm
Gilmore: Procedural History An all-white jury of six men and six women convicted defendant, a Read more » The post State of New Jersey v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:51 am
In the damages retrial in Capitol Records v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
In Hopkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:30 am
That is not to be treated as a “structural error” that undermines the verdict itself, the Court concluded in Hedgpeth v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
By a vote of 2 to 1, the Sixth Circuit refused this week, in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
legalweek "How did the jury calculate damages? [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion; PDF] 6-2 Thursday in Dietz v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
In a controversial split decision, the Supreme Court of Canada today reaffirmed the deference afforded juries in reaching verdicts based on inferences — even when those inferences are founded on conflicting, circumstantial evidence.The case, R. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:25 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court issued its opinion in Ramos v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:51 pm
It's a jury system the framers gave us, and that means the jury has to decide stuff. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:55 am
In the case, Lowman v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:51 am
Bloomberg TV interviewed Vel Hogan, the foreperson of the jury in the recent Apple v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:15 pm
In Hugh v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 8:18 pm
The case, Bankhead v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 2:46 pm
” Strength v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 11:53 am
The Court of Appeals published Williams v. [read post]
