Search for: "Juri v. Juri"
Results 581 - 600
of 50,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2023, 6:32 am
Plaintiff provided sufficient detail and testimony to provide a jury with a nonspeculative basis for finding that the accident was caused by the condition of the raised roadway (see Taveras v 1149 Webster Realty Corp., 134 AD3d 495, 496-497 [1st Dept 2015], affd, 28 NY3d 958 [2016]). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:30 am
In the case of Sewell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:23 am
The US Supreme Court previously found in Giboney v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am
Recently, a federal jury in the Middle District of Missouri found the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) and two major real estate brokerages—Keller Willams and HomeServices of America—liable under United States antitrust laws for conspiring to fix prices in the class action lawsuit, Burnett v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:06 am
Read the […] The post ROBERT JACKSON v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:01 am
The court sentenced Scarboro to […] The post DOMINICK SCARBORO v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
See Mosby v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:23 am
Finjan LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The case that prompted the discussion was the Aarow Equipment & Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm
From Murry v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 7:36 am
Jean Carroll defamation case.The case is Carroll v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
CAAF held in 2023 in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Bell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
He wants the jury to be instructed on gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, which is a lesser offense, and of which he's pretty clearly guilty. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am
The jury convicted the defendant. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
In other words, it is possible that Jack Smith might never see a jury in either case. [read post]
