Search for: "Juri v. Juri" Results 61 - 80 of 50,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2023, 9:15 am by James Pooley
That’s why I was surprised to see the recent opinion in Syntel v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:15 am by James Pooley
That’s why I was surprised to see the recent opinion in Syntel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 10:24 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
NY's high court, in a 5-2 decision (People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:58 am
Now that another case has come down to a jury trial, this one in Duluth, Minnesota, the RIAA is seeking to avoid a jury trial, this time by making a motion for summary adjudication of the facts.The defendant in Virgin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:24 am
For example, in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:18 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
And in the criminal context, while the Double Jeopardy Clause allows some forms of nullification, the Supreme Courts’ recent decision in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:20 pm
By popular demand, here are the jury instructions in the Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:48 pm by Barry Barnett
Blawgletter didn't follow the Trayvon Martin case -- State of Florida v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 12:35 pm
Benjamin Kurtz, Supreme Court Upholds a Mandate of Death When the Jury is in Equipoise: Challenged Under the Apprendi Interpretation of the 6th Amendment (Kansas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:09 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Last term, while recognizing a Batson violation in Foster v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:30 am by Karen Tani
Here's the abstract:This Note presents the first detailed analysis of the Supreme Court’s only published jury trial, Georgia v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:32 am by John Diekman
The Appellate Division found that, here, the disputed testimony of the parties presented issues of credibility which were for the jury to resolve.Student note::  A jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence.Case:  Daniel v. [read post]