Search for: "Juri v. Juri" Results 81 - 100 of 50,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2015, 12:32 am by John Diekman
The Appellate Division found that, here, the disputed testimony of the parties presented issues of credibility which were for the jury to resolve.Student note::  A jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence.Case:  Daniel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
This chapter explores this general development through detailed consideration of the particular case of Pierce v State (1843) 13 NH 536. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 5:29 pm
As a result, jury selection is a key aspect of trials on a wide variety of matters, including car accidents, as the Third District Court of Appeal's recent decision in Borroto v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:10 am by John Diekman
  While defendant's expert reached a different conclusion as to causation, the jury is free to accord more weight to the testimony of plaintiff's expert.Student note: The jury's resolution of the conflicting expert testimony is not a basis for an appellate court's disturbing the verdict.Case:  Douayi v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 1:43 am
NY's Top Court Says Individual Jury Poll Required New York's top court ruled Tuesday (Duffy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:51 am by John Diekman
It is within the province of the jury to determine issues of credibility, and great deference is accorded to the jury given its opportunity to see and hear the witnesses.Case:  Zhubrak v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:47 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  While the idea of the vanishing jury is not new, this is a good read if you want to learn more about Justice Lewis Powell and his role in cases like Batson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
As there has been much talk about the validity of the jury instructions in  Capital Records v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:37 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Abstract:       In E (CA799/2012) v R [2013] NZCA 678 the Court of Appeal directly confronted the issue of whether demeanour warnings should be required in all criminal jury trials. [read post]