Search for: "Justice v. Bass" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83 (30 June 2011) Appeal from: Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 723 See also: Innovation Patents Flop Like Stunned Mullet Infringement – claim construction – functional claim – whether ‘includes a pivotally moveable floor’ encompasses a mechanism in which this element is insufficient to perform a claimed function – meaning of ‘to… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:09 am by Mark Summerfield
On appeal before the Full Federal Court in Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83, the court reversed Justice Spender (see Fishy Business — Bass Baked by ‘Stunning’ Appeal). [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:03 am
The Court granted discretionary review so that it could vacate the lower court's decision and remand for reconsideration in light of Bass v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
"Bass has to hope the current justices don't share that view today, when the Court takes up what he thinks could be the most important patent decision in 40 years.Now a partner in the D.C. firm Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, Bass is part of the legal team that will be defending a disputed patent in the case of KSR International v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:49 pm by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the Supremes:  There are no anticipated military justice developments at SCOTUS on our radar screen. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:13 am by SHG
United States, which included all but Justices Kagan and Ginsburg (Gorsuch did not participate, which means Sotomayor was singing soprano to Alito’s bass), pulled a shrewd move. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:51 am by John O'Sullivan
Holt and Futter v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 11:30 am
Especially when you're at a white shoe firm like Skadden Arps.So when Justice Willhite wrote last month that counsel for defendants -- Joren Bass, Richard Zuromski, and Raoul Kennedy -- repeatedly "misled" the Court of Appeal, including at oral argument, by stating a certain fact that wasn't true, you can understand why these attorneys might have been more than a little bit bummed. [read post]