Search for: "K. S. v. State of Alabama" Results 161 - 180 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The appellate court applied the so-called "collateral bar" rule as set forth in Walker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm by Kevin Goldberg
  At this point I’m reminded of the opening statement of one Vincent LaGuardia Gambini in the fictitional trial of Alabama v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IAM)   United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Supp.2d 272, 292-93 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (applying Alabama law); Wiggins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
The FDA’s traceback investigation involved working with HDOH to trace the path of food eaten by those made ill back to a common source. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Posted by , on Friday, June 14, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of June 7–13, 2019. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
So we thought we’d do one of our 50-state updates on what states allow it and which ones don’t.Federal LawIt’s hard to see how market share liability could arise under federal law, but it has. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Epstein (Chicago), Neal K. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
To proponents, they help align the property tax with the taxpayer’s ability to pay. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
That's because this morning the Supreme Court said it will hear Carson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am by Emma Snell
Csaba Kőrösi, president of the U.N. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Pennsylvania may have gone mysteriously red in the dark of election night, but a federal judge in that state has just ruled that Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]