Search for: "KAITE v. ALTOONA STUDENT TRANSPORTATION, INC." Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2017, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Denying the employer’s renewed motion for judgment on the pleadings, a federal court in Pennsylvania ruled that discovery was necessary to make the factual determinations as to whether her preference not to be fingerprinted was a “religious belief,” whether the employer (as opposed to a governmental entity) imposed the fingerprinting requirement, and whether granting her accommodation request would have posed an undue hardship (Kaite v Altoona… [read post]