Search for: "KAY v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2008, 3:22 pm
Maurice Kay LJ then considered whether it was disproportionate to deny a right of residence to a person in the position of the appellant, particularly in the light of Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] ECR I-7091. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:51 am
& Anor> [2007] EWCA Civ 475 (23 May 2007) Secretary of State for the Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs v Bancoult R. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am by INFORRM
  The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
” At the National Review’s Bench Memos, Roger Clegg notes recent developments in California that, in his view, bolster the state’s case in Schuette v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am by NL
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am by NL
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
The post Fair Dealing Support for News Reporting and Public Debate: The Case of Warman and National Post v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am by Jill Murray, Olswang.
Both Maurice Kay LJ, Justice Tomlinson LJ agreed with Hooper LJ and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:44 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Danielle Kays and James Nasiri Seyfarth Synopsis: In February 2023, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in Cothron v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
 House Bill 43: Water Rights - Change Application AmendmentsRepresentative Kay L. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
An interesting Afghanistan habeas decision today, from the UK:  Yunus Ramhmatullah v. [read post]