Search for: "KERR v. JAMES"
Results 1 - 20
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
” Kerr J found that the statement did not carry a defamatory meaning at common law. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm
As James Madison put it in his Report of 1800, "Invasion is an operation of war. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am
In just the last few months, for example, opionions include People by James v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
H/t: Orin Kerr. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Kerr v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 1:06 pm
Michael Froomkin and Ian Kerr, eds. 2016).For an interesting exploration of the issues see James Boyle, Endowed by Their Creator? [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:13 am
Lord Kerr gave the dissenting judgment, with which Lord Reed agreed: they would both have allowed the appeal. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Reed agrees with Lord Kerr. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 10:57 am
Jones & Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Gulian, 2019 ONSC 7279 Italy The Art Newspaper reports that British dealer James Butterwick has been cleared of defamation for describing Russian Avant Garde works in an exhibition as fake. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 28 to 30 January 2020 there will be a CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
James Healy, 40, allegedly targeted Jones because of his media profile as an LGBT rights campaigner and left-wing activist. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Steyn J handed down judgment after a meaning trial in the case of James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm
On 4 November 2019 there will be an application in the case of James v Saunders. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
The context is important. 11:29: Lord Kerr again questions the relevance of these submissions to this appeal. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
