Search for: "KEY v. KEY" Results 1 - 20 of 32,061
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
One was the change in the basic premise of the role of trust in corporate governance from one that was  invested in trust of the individual--especially officers and directors  to one that became increasingly trusting of systems of assessments of the trustworthiness of those key governance actors. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Tami Stark and Ladan Stewart, White & Case LLP, on Saturday, July 20, 2024 Tags: ALJs, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Tami Stark and Ladan Stewart, White & Case LLP, on Saturday, July 20, 2024 Tags: ALJs, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am by Eleonora Rosati
Here's what Kimberley writes: Fanatics about trade mark infringement, cancellation and honest concurrent use in Australiaby Kimberley EvansIn FanFirm Pty Limited v Fanatics, LLC [2024] FCA 764, Justice Rofe of the Federal Court of Australia considered a number of interrelated trade mark issues, including trade mark infringement, honest concurrent use defences, defences to infringement based on registered trade mark rights, and what happens when the registered trade marks on which… [read post]
The Court of Appeal was clear, in the earlier case of Vestel v Access Advance [2021] EWCA Civ 440, that it is impermissible under English law to bring a free-standing claim for declaratory relief in relation to a FRAND licence. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 2:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Decision The Court set out the established standard for claim interpretation as defined in the 10x v Harvard/NanoString Court of Appeal case (consisting of 7 key elements) and upheld the CFI’s interpretation of the claim features of claim 1 of the patent on this basis. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
The calls to repeal no-fault divorce are nonsensical, but they result from the sexist attitudes that drove the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm by Lovechilde
So hear me when I say, I know Donald Trump’s type" -- Kamala HarrisDuring the 2020 primaries, when January 6th was just another winter day, Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
They also contrast sharply with the Supreme Court of Canada’s directives in R v Gladue, [1999] 1 SCR 688 and R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, which expects judges to consider systemic background factors at all stages of the criminal process. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm by Meredith Ervine
This Fried Frank alert identifies these key takeaways: – The decision reaffirms that, generally, directors will not face Caremark liability unless the factual context is extreme. [read post]