Search for: "KEY v. KEY" Results 321 - 340 of 28,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 11:48 am by Ashley Tabrizi
This provision has been incorporated in (i) the par trade confirmation; (ii) the distressed trade confirmation; (iii) the standard terms and conditions for distressed purchase and sale agreements; (iv) the standard terms and conditions for par/near par participation agreements; (v) the standard terms and conditions for distressed participation agreements; and (vi) the proceeds letter. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:14 am by Florian Mueller
The Neonode N1m smartphone didn't get much traction in the marketplace (with only a tiny number of units being sold in Sweden at the time), but it predated Apple's slide-to-unlock patent application, which is why it served as a key prior art reference in various disputes between Apple and Android device makers Samsung and Motorola Mobility. [read post]
The breadth of our discussions encompassed a spectrum of critical topics: 2024 Trade Secrets & Non-Competes Year in Review Navigating the Intersection of Non-Compete Agreements and Employee Mobility Employee Training Programs: Building a Culture of Confidentiality Navigating Legal Minefields: Insights from Seyfarth’s 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook Deciphering the FTC’s Non-Compete Ban: Navigating the New Regulatory Terrain and Adequately Protecting Employers’… [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Shivam Goel, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences describes the Legislative Pivot of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 and the Argument of 'Relevant Turnover' as Against 'Total Turnover': Key Takeaways from Excel Crop Care Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
A valet parking service does not owe a duty to third parties to refrain from returning car keys to an obviously drunk customer, a Florida appellate court ruled earlier this month in Weber v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
The National Consumers League will hold the Muller v. [read post]