Search for: "KEY v. KEY"
Results 321 - 340
of 28,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2020, 8:38 am
DurantLeah V. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:09 pm
For example, in Trianco, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 11:48 am
This provision has been incorporated in (i) the par trade confirmation; (ii) the distressed trade confirmation; (iii) the standard terms and conditions for distressed purchase and sale agreements; (iv) the standard terms and conditions for par/near par participation agreements; (v) the standard terms and conditions for distressed participation agreements; and (vi) the proceeds letter. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Velez v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:46 pm
See, e.g., Eubank v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:00 am
In Moon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:08 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:14 am
The Neonode N1m smartphone didn't get much traction in the marketplace (with only a tiny number of units being sold in Sweden at the time), but it predated Apple's slide-to-unlock patent application, which is why it served as a key prior art reference in various disputes between Apple and Android device makers Samsung and Motorola Mobility. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 9:07 am
The breadth of our discussions encompassed a spectrum of critical topics: 2024 Trade Secrets & Non-Competes Year in Review Navigating the Intersection of Non-Compete Agreements and Employee Mobility Employee Training Programs: Building a Culture of Confidentiality Navigating Legal Minefields: Insights from Seyfarth’s 2024 Commercial Litigation Outlook Deciphering the FTC’s Non-Compete Ban: Navigating the New Regulatory Terrain and Adequately Protecting Employers’… [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:45 am
Shivam Goel, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences describes the Legislative Pivot of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 and the Argument of 'Relevant Turnover' as Against 'Total Turnover': Key Takeaways from Excel Crop Care Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
A valet parking service does not owe a duty to third parties to refrain from returning car keys to an obviously drunk customer, a Florida appellate court ruled earlier this month in Weber v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
“Abortion Foes to Take New Aim at Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
That includes key evidence of potential criminal liability. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
The National Consumers League will hold the Muller v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:07 am
As I pointed out in the last post, one of the key points... [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:41 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 12:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:20 pm
V. [read post]