Search for: "KEY v. KEY" Results 381 - 400 of 28,727
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2024, 7:30 am by MEL
Lessons Learned for Employers The outcome of R v Greater Sudbury offers several critical takeaways for employers, particularly those who rely on third-party contractors for large projects: Control is Key: Employers must be cautious when exercising control over a worksite, even if a third-party contractor is in charge. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 3:06 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
Claiming expenses Accurately reporting income-related expenses is key to claiming deductions that reduce your overall taxable income. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 8:19 am by Nader Hasan (Toronto) and Silas Lee
For example, in Sandpiper Real Estate Fund 4 Limited Partnership v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A key reform appears to be legislation that guarantees that “the right to sue doesn’t hinge on material, consequential harm” (143). [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 5:33 am by Malcolm Hartwell
Key Points on Insurable Interest Ownership and Control: The court recognized that ownership of insured property naturally confers an insurable interest. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 4:48 am by SHG
Oral argument will be had today in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Accordingly, any military action that relies solely on these “inherent” powers should be deemed to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, and should be sustained only if it falls within the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” sphere of authority (per Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:27 am by Mark Nevitt
The annual climate summit, the 29th session of the United Nations Conference of Parties (COP29), concluded this week in Baku, Azerbaijan. [read post]
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
First, the IRA also includes several provisions designed to reenforce the holding of Massachusetts v. [read post]