Search for: "KITCHENS v. UNITED STATES" Results 221 - 240 of 384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 12:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state’s highest court relied primarily upon a 2001 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Kyllo v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm by admin
+Plain+%26+Fancy+Kitchens,+Inc.,+218+Va.+533,+238+S.E.2d+800+(1977)&hl=en&as_sdt=2,47 establishes, the long-arm statute exists “to assert jurisdiction, to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia.” [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:18 am by Susan Brenner
After stabbing him, [she] angrily stated, `That's what you get, m–––––f–––––.’U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:28 pm by Ronald Mann
But something funny happened on the way to the United States Reports, as the Court ultimately issued an opinion affirming the judgment of the Federal Circuit.  [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States.  [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:48 am by SHG
Section 1: Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:47 am by Rob Robinson
Read the complete Department of Justice announcement at Chinese Military Personnel Charged with Computer Fraud, Economic Espionage and Wire Fraud Criminal Indictment (United States of America v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:23 am by Robson Carpenter
This concern is seemingly becoming a reality following Ballingall v Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 111 (“Ballingall”) in which the trial judge stated [at paragraph 2] that following the Chan and Kilfoyl decisions, the legal landscape had changed. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:23 am by Robson Carpenter
This concern is seemingly becoming a reality following Ballingall v Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 111 (“Ballingall”) in which the trial judge stated [at paragraph 2] that following the Chan and Kilfoyl decisions, the legal landscape had changed. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:45 am by Florian Mueller
I have no idea whether this had also been the priority from the get-go, but even though it might have been misperceived as a "throw in the kitchen sink" claim, I'm quite sure Oracle knew all along that the copyright claim all by itself had the potential to convince Google of the benefits of a license agreement.In parallel to the district court case, Google challenged all of Oracle's patents-in-suit through reexamination requests filed with the United… [read post]