Search for: "KITCHENS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 281 - 300
of 480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Therefore, the well is a facility "from which oil or a hazardous substance was discharged""into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 9:30 am
(Wesch v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 9:30 am
(Wesch v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
’” First United Bank v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:45 am
I have no idea whether this had also been the priority from the get-go, but even though it might have been misperceived as a "throw in the kitchen sink" claim, I'm quite sure Oracle knew all along that the copyright claim all by itself had the potential to convince Google of the benefits of a license agreement.In parallel to the district court case, Google challenged all of Oracle's patents-in-suit through reexamination requests filed with the United… [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada stated in Dagg v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
On FRE’s part, the licence stated “we warrant for our part that the Housing Unit complies with all current legislation and is fully licensed as required to be used as residential property. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (1923). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm
Id. at *38 (quoting Desiano v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 10:20 pm
Manuel Barba v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:46 pm
(See California v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
In the latter category, we have Gallop v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
Often labeled as one of the biggest disrupters in the travel industry, STRs are particularly impactful on the United States tourist sector, with one estimate putting the size of the domestic vacation rental market at $100 billion. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
Often labeled as one of the biggest disrupters in the travel industry, STRs are particularly impactful on the United States tourist sector, with one estimate putting the size of the domestic vacation rental market at $100 billion. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:30 am
United States left in lingering doubt just how far Congress may go to pass a law to implement a world treaty. [read post]
