Search for: "KITCHENS v. UNITED STATES" Results 21 - 40 of 481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm by Michael Lowe
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Paul Pryzant and Matthew Simmons
 The Non-Competition Covenant prohibited Adams from competing anywhere in the states of Idaho and Washington, and within a 100 mile radius of any other location outside of those states in which Kodiak or any of its operating units had sold products or services in the 12 months prior to closing. [read post]
The SEC stated that “the Commission will hold investment advisers accountable when they do not accurately describe their incorporation of ESG factors into their investment selection process. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:28 am by Florian Mueller
., and "visit" the various agencies of the Executive Branch that are actually in charge of SEP policy and/or the related enforcement:The Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have recently withdrawn a SEP policy statement. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
September 28, 2021 | States Regain Regulatory Power Over Predatory Loan Servicers | The Education Department’s new interpretation of federal law empowers states to protect student loan borrowers. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
Throughout their time in the United States, Respondent has ensured that AC kept in contact with her father. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada stated in Dagg v. [read post]