Search for: "KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc."
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 8:36 pm
See KP Permanent Make-Up Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:00 am
Still a ball of confusion: KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:06 am
See KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:03 pm
See KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:24 am
See, e.g., KP Permanent Make-Up Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:49 am
At the same time, however, the Supreme Court has held that a registered, incontestable mark that is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning, and therefore not likely to confuse consumers, cannot support a successful claim for trademark infringement. (38, discussing KP Permanent Make-Up v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm
Lasting Impression I, Inc., 543 U.S. 111, 118? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
Here’s Joe’s summary and an excerpt from KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
” (Citing KP Permanent Make–Up, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:49 pm
Here’s Joe’s summary and an excerpt from KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:49 pm
KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
New Life Art Inc., now on appeal, is an interesting case in this regard. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Lasting Impression I, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
More to the point, as the Supreme Court clarified in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:32 pm
’ But that rule is plainly inconsistent with [KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:07 am
KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]