Search for: "Kahn v. Kahn" Results 181 - 200 of 791
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 3:57 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Supreme Court recently clarified the “ab initio” requirement announced in the Kahn v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:34 am by Lev Sugarman
Rachael Hanna summarized pre-sentencing hearings in the United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:29 am by John Jascob
According to the Chancery Court, the business judgment rule applied to the transaction to combine Bold Energy with Earthstone Energy because it was structured to comply with the conditions set forth in Kahn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:21 am
The Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari in Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kahn III is a thoughtful discussion of the difference between legal malpractice and an overbiling case. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:03 am by Scott Harman
Sarah Grant summarized the oral argument in Force v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kahn and Kahn & Licker, LLP, moved, and the defendant Diversified Land Services, Ltd., separately moved, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Strujan v Kaufman & Kahn, LLP  2019 NY Slip Op 00630  Decided on January 30, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department is an example. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am by Scott Harman
Matthew Kahn shared the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]