Search for: "Kahn v. Kahn"
Results 41 - 60
of 794
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 8:06 am
The Court of Appeals says plaintiff failed to do so, and the case is dismissed.The case is Antrobus v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
IPSO 19756-23 Saunders v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19679-23 Saunders v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 18579-23 Reynolds v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediated 18539-23 Garnier v Tenbury Wells Advertiser, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigatio 17700-23… [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 2:13 pm
Prior to the doctrinal shift of Kahn v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 2:33 pm
See Kahn v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
” SEC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:31 am
July 29, 2022), the Delaware Chancery Court, applying the MFW standard, Kahn v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:31 am
July 29, 2022), the Delaware Chancery Court, applying the MFW standard, Kahn v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
Here, the defendants established, prima facie, that the plaintiff’s legal malpractice and Judiciary Law § 487 causes of action were time-barred, as they accrued when the underlying actions were commenced in 2013 and 2015 (see Sclafani v Kahn, 169 AD3d 846, 849; Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 167-168). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
(Brack v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
In KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
‘In these circumstances, it is for the jury to determine whether an ordinary reader would have understood the article as a factual assertion…’” Kahn v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:00 am
United Statesor Camp v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:33 pm
The New York City Department of Education may discontinue the employment of a probationary teacher pursuant to Education Law §2573(1)(a) at any time and for any reason absent the teacher's establishing that "the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith”* (Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765 [1988]; see Education Law §§ 3012-c [1], 3012-d [9];… [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:33 pm
The New York City Department of Education may discontinue the employment of a probationary teacher pursuant to Education Law §2573(1)(a) at any time and for any reason absent the teacher's establishing that "the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith”* (Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765 [1988]; see Education Law §§ 3012-c [1], 3012-d [9];… [read post]
