Search for: "Kahn v. Kahn"
Results 141 - 160
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2020, 5:29 am
Stockholder Litigation (“HomeFed”), the Delaware Court of Chancery considered on a motion to dismiss whether a squeeze-out merger by a controlling stockholder complied with the procedural framework set forth in Kahn v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Kahn v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:10 pm
This was similarly at issue in Kahn v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
Kahn v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Salzburg et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:09 am
Class V Stockholders Litigation, [1] finding that the complaint alleged facts that made it “reasonably conceivable” that the safe harbor established by Kahn v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
CFPB and Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
Gerberding's okay with that, and so is Officer Khan, but Officer Kahn tells him that certain stuff -- pets, food, and soiled clothes -- can't be stored since they're a health hazard, so those will have to be taken out. [read post]
23 May 2020, 7:30 am
Salladay is the first time that a Delaware court has held that the ab initio requirement established by Kahn v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:18 am
Eckman, Kahn Scolnick, Emily Riff, and Warren Loegering. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Adverse event reporting is a recognized, important component of pharmacovigilence. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:47 pm
Cambridge Retirement System v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 2:01 pm
KKR Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015); Kahn v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
At Top of the Ninth, Merle Kahn breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 5:45 am
Thereafter, a majority of unaffiliated AmTrust stockholders approved the amended merger proposal.The plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that the final transaction did not comply with the framework set forth in Kahn v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
Holdings LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015) and Kahn v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am
Kahn and Kahn & Licker, LLP, moved, and the defendant Diversified Land Services, Ltd., separately moved, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:20 pm
The High Court determined that the requirement was not satisfied based on the facts of the instant case because the “economic bargaining took place prior to the date” when the protections announced in the Kahn v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:42 am
Sclafani v Kahn 2019 NY Slip Op 01115 [169 AD3d 846] February 13, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department gives a good theoretical explanation of continuous representation and the underlying requirements of continuing trust and confidence as well as a shared understanding of the need for further work. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
