Search for: "Kaminski v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 5:39 am by Danielle Citron
  Professor Kaminski is a Research Scholar at Yale as well as the Executive Director of the Yale Information Society Project–we have been lucky to feature her insights on United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:58 pm by Yosie Saint-Cyr
  The Ontario Superior Court of Justice put forward several motions in a wrongful dismissal case, Kaminsky v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:35 am by John Diekman
If there is any doubt as to the availability of a defense, it should not be dismissed.Case: Chestnut Realty Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 8:24 am by Holly Johnston, Esq.
The legislation is a response to the recent Supreme Court decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the instant complaint, while more verbose than the prior complaint, still fails to state a cause of action for “overreaching, undue influence and fraud” (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:51 am by Woodrow Pollack
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Granted.Kaminski v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Judge Kozinski has written compelling and impressive dissents before—the 1993 White v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 8:51 am
pic.twitter.com/JTQe0lADbY— Article V Convention of States please (@philthatremains) August 30, 2021 It was comedy repurposed as fake news, Reuters reports, in "Fact Check-Clip appearing to show Nancy Pelosi saying she does not want Joe Biden to talk at a conference originated as satire. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kaminski: Motivated in part by the puzzle of Stanley v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:33 am by David G. Badertscher
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Ex-Executive Indicted for Trade Secret Theft In Computer Source Code's Misappropriation United States v. [read post]