Search for: "Kansas v. Colorado" Results 161 - 180 of 371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services1301 Young Street, Suite 1169Dallas, TX 75202Voice Phone (214)767-4056FAX (214)767-0432TDD (214)767-8940Region VII - Kansas City (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska)Frank Campbell, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
It’s the stuff of nightmares for procrastinating creators in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida! [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by Tammy Binford
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
”     Twenty-one informational protests were held in 16 states, including Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Washington, and Wyoming. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:55 pm by Amy Howe
  This means that, although they were not directly before the Court, bans in North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Colorado, Kansas, and Wyoming are also effectively dead. [read post]