Search for: "Karlin v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court of Appeals stated that insofar as the requested records are exempt from disclosure pursuant to State statute, the police are not obligated to provide the records even though redaction might remove all details which tend to identify the victim akin to Matter of Karlin v McMahon, Matter of Short v Bd. of Managers of Nassau County Medical Center. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm by Howard Bashman
“Louisiana’s abortion ban was again blocked by judge; A hearing is set for Monday; The decision again opens the door for the state’s clinics”: Sam Karlin of The Times-Picayune of New Orleans has this report. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:25 am by Public Employment Law Press
Source: Albany Time UnionIn its decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals held in Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, although "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure," in this instance an affirmation of the Village Attorney demonstrating a valid basis for the denial of the Freedom of Information [FOIL] request at issue by establishing that the records sought therein were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i) and thus… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals held in Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, although "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure," in this instance an affirmation of the Village Attorney demonstrating a valid basis for the denial of the Freedom of Information [FOIL] request at issue by establishing that the records sought therein were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i) and thus… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:01 am by David G. Badertscher
October 6, 2010Paterson’s workforce reductions, agency by agencyposted by Rick Karlin at Capitol Confidential - Below is a worksheet from the Budget Division showing the targets for state agency workforce numbers by the end of this calendar year. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
DECISION: Susan Larabee, Michael Nenno, Patricia Nunez and Geoffrey Wright v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:44 pm
DECISION: Susan Larabee, Michael Nenno, Patricia Nunez and Geoffrey Wright v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Karimian v Karlin  2019 NY Slip Op 05193  Decided on June 27, 2019  Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Karimian v Karlin  2019 NY Slip Op 05193  Decided on June 27, 2019  Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court, after reviewing the documents in camera, finds that the NYPD has met its burden of proving exemption for these reports akin to Johnson v New York City Police Department. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on the April 29 argument in Glossip v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 6:25 am by Jon Sands
The precedent, notably US v Bettancourt, 614 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1980), states that prior assaults are rarely permissible under 404(b). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the conviction and 180 month sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in United States v, Kelley Kelley was convicted after a bench trial in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. [read post]