Search for: "Kathryn Watts" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
According to an excellent paper written by Kathryn Watts, numerous twentieth Justices, including Owen Roberts, Benjamin Cardozo, Charles Whitaker, and Charles Evan Hughes, destroyed all or nearly all of their papers.Justice William Brennan, who served on the Supreme Court for thirty-four years, gave one biographer virtually exclusive access to his papers for almost twenty years. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 10:20 am by Amanda Frost
  According to Kathryn Watts, the Justice had a “sense of balance in life,” which made him a great role model for those who clerked for him. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Briefly: This blog continues its symposium on the fiftieth anniversary of Alexander Bickel’s The Least Dangerous Branch with posts by Michael Seidman and Kathryn Watts. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Attorney John Watts, Attorney Gerry Oginski, Attorney Kathryn Harry and I just enjoyed this one from Attorney Melchor Eduardo Quevedo Let’s face it.  [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 3:02 am
Pearlstein, Associate Research Scholar, Woodrow Wilson School for Public & International Affairs, Princeton University, and former Director, Law & Security Program, Human Rights First; and Kathryn Watts, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Washington School of Law.Details and registration (California MCLE available) -- and, following the conference, a webcast of the event -- may be found here. [read post]
4 May 2021, 8:49 am by fjhinojosa
Watt’s article Tyranny by Proxy: State Action and the Private Use of Deadly Force is cited in the following article: Osagie K. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
In a forthcoming article for the New York University Law Review, Professors Elizabeth Porter and Kathryn Watts, both of the University of Washington School of Law, discuss what they call the growing culture of “visual rulemaking”—the use of “political tinged visuals” by rulemaking stakeholders to push regulatory agendas. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am by Steve Vladeck
This reality is only that much more significant given that, as Kathryn Watts points out in her contribution to this symposium, the movement toward an almost entirely discretionary docket (much of which post-dated Bickel) has made it possible for the Justices to be passively virtuous without deigning to explain themselves. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
One of the cases presented to me at this moot was Kathryn Leah Smithen v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm by Michael Cook
Recent Developments in Personal Care and Other Home and Community-Based Services in Medicaid and Medicare I. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Given that, what is your view of Kathryn Watts’s argument that the working papers of federal judges, including Supreme Court Justices – meaning their internal chambers’ papers and electronic correspondence and documents relating to cases and other official court business – should be treated as governmental property? [read post]