Search for: "Katz v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
The article mentions this blog by name: The California Supreme Court's decision in Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:00 pm
Superior Court (Rehearing petition filed Circuit City Stores, Inc., real party in interest by Steven B. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 1:24 am
In Burlington, Vermont, Superior Court Judge Matthew Katz has granted plaintiff James Turner's motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury's verdict that the statute of limitations precluded his recovery of damages from the Catholic diocese for negligent supervision of a former priest who had abused Turner. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 9:00 pm
Here is a valuable Pennsylvania Superior Court case (Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
Superior Court will be heard tomorrow before the California Supreme Court in Los Angeles. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:55 am by The Complex Litigator
According to Steven Katz, partner at Reed Smith LLP, Gentry is one of the California Supreme Court's most erroneously-reasoned decisions in quite some time. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
We got a kick out of it because it mentioned this blog, as well as two others we read regularly.The California Supreme Court's decision in Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:34 am
The Ontario Court of Justice acquitted Castonguay, but that decision was reversed by the Superior Court. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
  Legal Times references a lengthy Westat study apparently showing lower reoffending with Superior Court diversion. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”J.A. 55. (...)The principal issue this court mustaddress is whether jurisdiction in the district court wasproper in light of the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncementin Gunn v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:13 am
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA Plaintiff Corporation, Inc., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION ) Defendant ) FILE No. [read post]