Search for: "Katz v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
The less-known case (United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:50 pm
No, said the Ninth Circuit yesterday in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
The 11th Amendment provides that the “Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
However, as to that detour, see below concerning “Reference” procedure.This delay and retroactivity is unacceptable by any measure, and the Supreme Court of Canada, at my behest along with Ariel Katz and Prof. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:29 am
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
In Katz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:30 pm
United States, winning a decision from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights holding that the United States violated international human rights law for failing to respond adequately to gender-based violence. [read post]
7 May 2019, 9:01 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Katz and Laura McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, March 29, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board dynamics, Board performance, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Diversity, Outside directors Independent Directors: New Class of 2018 Posted by Steve W. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
Kennedy authored the second, United States v. [read post]
Exigent Circumstances: What They Are and How They Allow Police to Search and Seize Without a Warrant
15 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
App. 1991), citing to United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Katz notes that the purpose of the CDA was to protect people, particularly children, inside the United States, and to incentivize platforms to clean up the internet themselves. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]