Search for: "Kay v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:02 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Under the United States Supreme Court decisions and our [State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:09 pm by Dan Ernst
[Earlier I noted an event sponsored by the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, entitled "The DC Circuit in the McCarthy Era: United States v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:51 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM - 63176/00 [2007] ECHR 400 (22 May 2007) MCELROY AND OTHERS v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:11 am
Two recent United States District Court Cases, one out of Minnesota, Kay Beer Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:11 am by Lee E. Berlik
Two recent United States District Court Cases, one out of Minnesota, Kay Beer Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Notably, there was only one female in his unit during his tenure, and her employment ended nearly 20 months prior to the dress incident. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am by Eric P. Robinson
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release  -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am by Eric P. Robinson
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release  -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
  At some point thereafter, the United States moved him to Bagram in Afghanistan. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Times reported late last week thatThe Orange County district attorney’s office on Friday charged 11 defendants with conspiring to disrupt a meeting and a speech by the Israeli ambassador to the United States at UC Irvine last year....In a statement, Orange County Dist. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The plaintiffs have two main arguments, which they summarize: The Act improperly authorizes that civilians in the United States be detained indefinitely by the military, that they be tried by military commission or military court and that they may be subject to removal to other jurisdictions in violation of the Amendments V and VI of the Constitution. [read post]