Search for: "Kay v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Of particular relevance was the ECtHR decision in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR 29. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
House Bill 43: Water Rights - Change Application AmendmentsRepresentative Kay L. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Reasons for dismissing the appeal: Maurice Kay LJ and Sullivan LJ agreed with Laws LJ in dismissing the appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:17 pm
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania agreed finding in favor of Lesher. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:50 am
Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v Campbell, Mem. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:50 am
Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v Campbell, Mem. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
Senator Kay Hagan (D-NC) was pleased to see that the Volcker Rule as modified by the Dodd-Frank Act will permit banking entities several years to bring their full range of activities into conformance with the new rule. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Supreme Court: Original Jurisdiction and Oral Arguments, and Domestic Violence: Resources in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
The judgment handed down yesterday, Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) was a public judgment and was said to be expressed in muted or anodyne terms by the Lord Justice Maurice Kay. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
Here are the official positions of each party:The Republicans aver that the Democrats, sensing weakness, refused to approve a reasonable spending bill until the Republicans and Trump agreed to 1) Let all Mexicans who have criminal records into the United States with fast access to becoming citizens. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court, updating the application of the cumulative advances in antitrust economics as applied to vertical restraint cases, overruled the venerable Dr. [read post]
