Search for: "Kay v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
 Here are the official positions of each party:The Republicans aver that the Democrats, sensing weakness, refused to approve a reasonable spending bill until the Republicans and Trump agreed to 1) Let all Mexicans who have criminal records into the United States with fast access to becoming citizens. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am by Sheppard Mullin
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court, updating the application of the cumulative advances in antitrust economics as applied to vertical restraint cases, overruled the venerable Dr. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by SHG
The United States, thanks to Alabama, just joined that list. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Monday, July 11, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am by Rosalind English
The courts should take into account agreements such as the MoU and should assume that they would be adhered to, following RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2009) UKHL. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:48 am by Kent Scheidegger
Without dissent, the United States Supreme Court has once again summarily reversed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In their 2009 petition, appellants state that Zargari entered into an agreement with Kay Jewelers for a credit account and that the account is governed by the credit card agreement. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by Kali Borkoski
United States Law Offices of Mitchell N. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:43 pm
(see Case 27/76 United Brands and United Brands Continentaal v Commission [1978]).It was for the referring court to ascertain whether the orders were ordinary in the light of both the previous business relations between the pharmaceuticals company holding a dominant position and the wholesalers concerned and the size of the orders in relation to the requirements of the market in the Member State concerned (see Case 77/77 Benzine en Petroleum Handelsmaatschappij… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
Marco Sassòli, The Convergence of the International Humanitarian Law of Non-International and International Armed Conflicts – The Dark Side of a Good Idea Urs Saxer, Staaten als Grundeinheiten des internationalen Systems Edzard Schmidt-Jortzig, Politik und Ethik Paul Seger, Let the Sunshine In: Five Small States on a Mission to a More Transparent United Nations Security Council Bruno Simma, »Ja, aber«: Der International Gerichtshof und das zwingende… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
STEPHANIE KAY LANNINGon writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit[June 7, 2010] Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
He argued that while there may be legal limits on presidential power to ban noncitizens from the United States, the courts should still defer to the executive branch, taking Donald Trump’s word for it that he is no longer intent on banning Muslims from the United States. [read post]