Search for: "Keel v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The fiscal responses to the COVID-19 pandemic will require policymakers to consider what revenue resources should be used to fill budget gaps. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
On the other hand, it is possible that the DST violates both the fundamental freedoms and the state aid rules. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm by Kevin Kaufman
First, the proposal states that “consumer-facing” businesses are the focus. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:05 am by Kevin Kaufman
Part I reviews the history of adoption of CFC rules around the world (focusing on the countries identified below) including the initial adoption of subpart F by the United States in 1962. [read post]
4 May 2019, 8:16 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Dunn and Samuel Schirer won in State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day judgment was handed down in the case of R (on the application of Jefferies & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin). [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am by David Markus
To the extent that our earlier decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Miriam Siefert analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The organisation is called NOYB (none of your business)  Surveillance The Register notes the judgment in the case of R (Privacy International) v Secretary of State [2017] EWCA Civ 1868 entitled “UK spy court ruled immune from judicial review – for now”. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
So you went to law school right as a generation of legal thinkers was persuading people, bit by bit, that both judicial activism and restraint were misguided, and that courts can and must enforce constitutional limits on the state. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:24 pm by raoneeri
At the conference, he delivered a presentation entitled “LGBT Employment Discrimination in the United States post-Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am by Alexandra Gutierrez
VERRILLI: With Congress, it’s true there have been times in the [United States v.] [read post]