Search for: "Keen v. Keen"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 8:52 pm
One particular Komodo has a keen interest in Intellectual Property (see IP Komodo’s blog at http://ipkomododragon.blogspot.com/). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:36 pm
Nick Bagley and I have a short piece in The Atlantic offering the incoming House of Representatives three strategies for super-simple legislation that would end the litigation in Texas v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:25 am
Most recently, Judge Feinberg in IC/L-A Washington Road, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
In a lengthy opinion after remand from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Lovelace v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 12:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:51 am
The Ninth finds a little light, amongst the gray.United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
And these posts may be of interest to you… Joe Biden v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
The Associated Press v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Among the questions explored: how high were the stakes in that suit, and why might the defendants have been keen on an arbitration order? [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 pm
Understandably, those featured are not keen on them; more contentious is the way that they more generally cast the neutrality of the media in doubt. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
(See Sobremonte v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:48 am
Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:09 am
I think there are some people in there who are ex-commenters of this blog, and some people are keen to tell Glenn that I don't belong there. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:48 pm
The complaint (full text) in Foothill Church v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:05 am
In Keene v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
Marvallous Keene is now dead, as we knew he would be. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:09 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
In preparing for potential intellectual property litigation, it's quite common to speak to a number of experts to identify the best one possible for the case.So, in light of the confidential and legally privileged discussions you have with them, you're not so keen to have the expert you didn't choose end up working for the opposing party.Collective wisdom holds that a confidentiality agreement and transfer of a modicum of confidential information, however brief, should be… [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:12 am
" This was stated as far back as 1854, in Hadley v. [read post]
