Search for: "Keene v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Keeping in mind William Worthy’s travels, there is irony here, too; Agee was not overly keen to travel back to the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
The United States appears to have a few ‘issues’ with judicial systems that do not fall within their control. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:36 pm
United States and preserve the ACA. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 12:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:13 am
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals has raised an interesting question and important reminder in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:57 am
United States, 503 U.S. 193, 203 (1992). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, “[a]t least six justices seemed keen to widen the Fourth Amendment umbrella for the digital age, but no single way to do so emerged. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Trademark Office (PDF) Reply Brief for Petitioner Bernard L. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:57 pm
People with a keen grasp of legal history may recall that from the time that the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 6:29 am
As reported in our previous blogpost, on 7 October 2022, the US White House published an Executive Order on enhancing safeguards for United States signals intelligence activities (EO). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm
RB (Algeria)-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10; [2009] 2 WLR 512 says not. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:56 am
It’s been some time since I last blogged but, in the meantime, I’ve followed with keen interest the diplomatic crisis between the United States concerning the Indian diplomat, Devyani Khobragade. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, abortion is once again a crime in large swaths of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:09 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
