Search for: "Keeton v. State" Results 81 - 97 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Dennis Crouch
In its brief, the petitioner does a fine job of distinguishing Keeton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:22 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Prosser & Keeton on Torts § 111, at 771 (5th ed. 1984 & Supp. 1988). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
’’ Id. at 470 (quoting Prosser and Keeton, [The Law of Torts], 266 (5th ed.1984)). [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
See Burger King Corp., 471 U.S. at 472-73; Keeton v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]