Search for: "Keith Paul Bishop" Results 41 - 60 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2019, 3:47 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop offers some guidance to this question that became even more fraught with the passage of the California gender quota bill. [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:25 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop evaluates California law on the question: In the case of a California corporation, the answer is no. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 8:57 am
Writes Keith Paul Bishop, "shocked" by the brief filed by 44 law professors in the Hobby Lobby case, in a post that Professor Bainbridge called "A truly great post that made me very happy." [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:07 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop's post raises that rather interesting question. [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:55 am by Steve Bainbridge
From Bishop's blog: Last month, the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) sent a letter to its California real estate and private equity managers asking that they take a number of... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 1:39 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Via Liz Dunshee, Keith Paul Bishop remarks on the California board gender quota law: I blogged a few weeks ago that only 318 companies that are subject to California’s board diversity statute have... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:09 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop writes: ISS fails to mention contrary studies that reach the opposite conclusion. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop has spotted two key ambiguities: SB 826 (Jackson) is reputably the first state law requiring publicly held corporations to have a minimum number of female directors. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 2:53 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Prof Murray: Here, Professor Bainbridge kindly asks for my thoughts on Keith Paul Bishop's article Would Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:55 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop explains: The Nevada Supreme Court has not expressly held that the laws for piercing the corporate veil under the alter-ego doctrine apply to LLCs, but it has applied... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 11:25 am by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop reports on ISS's proposed new rule on maximum board memberships: The following table summarizes ISS’ current and proposed policy with respect to recommending votes against directors... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 2:42 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop raises this pertinent question: Yesterday, UCLA Law School Professor... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:50 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop reports on Commissioner Pierce's comments to the Society for Corporate Governance: The text of the bill explicitly makes a business case to justify the law’s existence; it points to... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop writes: A recent study by four professors finds quite a few faults with older directors: "Specifically, older independent directors are more likely to miss board meetings and less... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 5:16 am by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop reports: In an opinion filed yesterday, the Fourth District Court of Appeal held that reverse veil piercing may be applied to a Delaware limited liability company. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:51 am by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop reports: Last August, I reported on the filing of a taxpayer challenge to California's Board Gender Quota Law. [read post]
12 May 2015, 11:24 am by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop makes a nice point: The problem with “fee-shifting bylaws” starts with the name. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 2:42 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop reports that: In 2018, the California legislature enacted SB 826 (Jackson) which imposed gender quotas on corporate boards of directors of "publicly held corporations". [read post]