Search for: "Keith Paul Bishop" Results 141 - 160 of 216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
., American Economic Review via MR] Shareholder litigation: “New ‘loser pays’ standard could curb abusive lawsuits” [Examiner editorial] Delaware take note: corporate by-law changes that cut off fee-seeking opportunism deserve acclaim [Keith Paul Bishop via Bainbridge] NYT was hot on “Goldman Sachs manipulated aluminum market” allegations but judge wasn’t [Reuters, July 2013 NYT] CFPB might shrug off discrimination and… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Anthony Colbert, “Fairness Hearings,”  California Business Law Practitioner 44 (Spring 2010) Keith Paul Bishop, “California Fairness Hearings: A Low-Cost Alternative to Federal Registration in Acquisition Transactions,”  15 Insights 23 (Feb. 2001)  The Department of Corporation’s website provides this summary of fairness hearings from 2001 to 2007.   [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
You Might Be Surprised By Who Counts (And Who Doesn’t) In California by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law Many issuers continue to rely on California’s limited offering exemption to avoid the necessity of qualifying the offer and sale of their securities. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 6:22 am by Doug Cornelius
As Keith Paul Bishop points out on his blog, there are dozens of candidates on the state primary ballots with over forty on California’s List of Generally Recognized Presidential Candidates for California Primary. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate & Securities Law [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Now a 79-year-old laser scientist faces sanctions who’s been a U.S. citizen for 10 years and says he isn’t friendly with Putin [Steven Mufson, Washington Post] “Why California’s Gender Quota Bill [for corporate boards] Is More Likely To Be Unconstitutional Than California’s Pseudo-Foreign Corporation Statute” [Keith Paul Bishop, California Corporate & Securities Law (Allen Matkins)] Tags: attorneys general, California,… [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 5:11 am by Walter Olson
’s Lloyds to curtail insurance availability in a way specifically targeted at the association [Stephen Gutowski thread] “The Misguided Quest to Limit Choice in Consumer Credit” [Diego Zuluaga] “The CFPB and Payday Lending Regulations” [Peter Van Doren last February; earlier on payday lending; Federalist Society Regulatory Transparency Project video on regulation-through-investigation of payday lenders with Jamie Fulmer, Chris Peterson, and Brian Knight] Federalist… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Answer May Have Surprising Consequences by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate & Securities Law In my experience, companies most often hold board and shareholder meetings at or near their principal executive offices . [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Broc Romanek
Placement Agent Regulation Makes Headline News On "The Mentor Blog," I've recently posted a few items from Keith Bishop of Allen Matkins about placement agent regulation. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law The really important question is what is the legal effect, if any, of preambles to rules? [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:55 am by Doug Cornelius
 The request letter authored by Keith Paul Bishop takes us on a great stroll on the analysis of “what is a security? [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
This could lead to an approximately 22 percent increase of female directorships nationwide.However, ISS’s conclusions were met with skepticism by Allen Matkins partner Keith Paul Bishop, who noted that the study authors did not explain how they determined director gender or clarify whether companies excluded by the law were included in the statistics.Potential legal snags. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: Commissioner Issues Proposed Revisions To Proposed Private Fund Adviser Exemption by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law Blog Proposed changes to Rule 260.204.9 [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate & Securities Law Blog While it is tempting to think that the test is now 2,000 record holders, a more realistic assessment would be to consider the test unchanged unless the issuer is able to keep track of the accredited investor status of its shareholders. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] “And” Or “Or” – This Ninth Circuit Opinion Highlights The Difference by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate Securities Law “And” and “or” are classified as conjunctions. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
[more…]   Why The WSJ Is Wrong About SEC Rulemaking On Claw backs by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires the SEC to require the stock exchanges to prohibit the listing of securities of issuers that have not developed and implemented compensation claw-back policies. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by Doug Cornelius
by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law A California administrative decision illustrates how a simple dinner party can get suddenly veer from a purely social gathering to arguably a public offering of securities. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:38 am by Doug Cornelius
by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate & Securities Law The SEC Will Be Your Employment Law Agency, Too by David Smyth in Cady Bar the Door In a twist, ex-Cabot Lodge compliance officer recants, says he was wrong by Bruce Kelly in Investment News [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Franchise Tax Board’s Doing Business Legal Ruling – Ex Nihilo, Aliquid Fit by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate & Securities Law Gotcha! [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:00 am by Doug Cornelius
by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate & Securities Law blog Even though the federal statute is named the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, persons regulated by that act often refer to themselves as “advisors” and not “advisers”. [read post]