Search for: "Keller v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 3:51 pm
United States:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-complaint For more on FOSTA:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/how-congress-censored-internet Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:00 am
In the United States, that means litigation in federal district court, which can easily cost millions of dollars. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:11 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 9:09 am
ACREM, INC. d/b/a Stetsons Nightclub, and was decided by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights, comes from Miriam Seifter. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
United States, 917 F. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm
”For the decision:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-appeals-court-rulingFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states Contact: AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm
Contreras v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:43 am
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion on April 11, 2011, where part of the case dealt with the requirements of an EUO. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
The court discussed that there are three different approaches to the problem of deviation in the United States; 1) the "strict" or "conversion" rule, 2) the "liberal" rule, and 3) the "minor deviation" rule. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
In this memo, Practice Center Contributor Stan Keller discusses what might happen now: With the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit having struck down Rule 14a-11 in Business Roundtable et al v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
United States, 917 F. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
" In another case involving the implementation of a contract arbitration procedure, Wayne Finger Lakes BOCES v Keller, decided by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department on February 16, 2000, the court granted Keller's motion to compel the arbitration of a contract dispute. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
("The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials," Soke v. [read post]
