Search for: "Kelley v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Just over a month ago, employers throughout the United States breathed a sigh of relief after Judge Ada Brown in the Northern District of Texas issued a summary judgment ruling in the Ryan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am by Madelaine Lane
The Court denied a motion to recuse Chief Justice Kelley in Grievance Administrator v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Buchwald of Kelley, Drye & Warren LLP, counsel for the call-girl involved in the Gov. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant’s evidentiary submissions did not establish that a material fact alleged in the complaint is not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d 871, 873; see also Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d at 589). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:07 pm by John M. Kaman
The case is titled People v Kelley Supreme Court Docket No S164830.Why and What Does This Mean for Me? [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 7:27 pm
The Daily Record wrote up an article, 4th Circuit Backs Consumers Whose Cars Are Totaled which outlined a new decision in Decohen v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
One of her sisters introduced her to Florence Kelley, a powerful New York City reformer, and Goldmark left Barnard to work with Kelley at the National Consumers League (NCL). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:47 am by SHG
Stafford Const., Inc., 271 Conn. at 87-88, 856 A.2d 372; Kelley v. [read post]