Search for: "Kelley v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Jeffrey Prince, Indiana University – Kelley School of Business – Department of Business Economics & Public Policy, Scott Wallsten, Technology Policy Institute Protecting Our Digital Identity: The Argument for Adopting Uniform Privacy Laws in the United States, Rebecca Cooper, Independent The Need to Protect Freedom of Expression on the Internet through a Human Rights-Based in Indonesia, Anak Agung Ayu Nanda Saraswati, University of Brawijaya Next Week in the Courts… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
O’Kelley 19-956Issues: (1) Whether a panel decision decided nine days before the relevant conduct in question constitutes clearly established law to deprive government officers of qualified immunity; (2) whether timing constitutes an extraordinary circumstance as articulated by Harlow v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:17 am by Nicholas Mosvick
The law was inspired by progressive reformer Florence Kelley, who drafted an eight-hour day for women for Illinois in 1893 that was later struck down by the Illinois Supreme Court in 1895 as infringing upon the state and federal constitutions, setting the stage for 20 states to follow suit with 10-hour workday regulations. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
One of her sisters introduced her to Florence Kelley, a powerful New York City reformer, and Goldmark left Barnard to work with Kelley at the National Consumers League (NCL). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Estate of Norman Perlman v Kelley  2019 NY Slip Op 06475 Decided on September 11, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department goes on to catalog how and why the service was bad. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]