Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly" Results 41 - 60 of 3,562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Talley (Columbia Law School), on Thursday, June 27, 2024 Tags: DFC Global Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Talley (Columbia Law School), on Thursday, June 27, 2024 Tags: DFC Global Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:38 pm by William A. Jacobson
My appearance on the Jesse Kelly Show talking about the Supreme Court ruling in Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Now that Donald Trump has secured the Republican nomination, won federal court rulings making it extremely unlikely he will be disqualified from seeking office, and apparently established that even a felony conviction will not torpedo his campaign, the time has truly come for a careful analysis of his campaign’s immigration policy proposals. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
If public-school students have a First Amendment right to wear black armbands at school in protest of the Vietnam War (in Tinker v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
On the contrary, the charges notified petitioner in detail of the conduct charged (see Wolfe v Kelly, 79 AD3d 406, 407, 410 [1st Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 17 NY3d 844 [2011]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
On the contrary, the charges notified petitioner in detail of the conduct charged (see Wolfe v Kelly, 79 AD3d 406, 407, 410 [1st Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 17 NY3d 844 [2011]). [read post]