Search for: "Kelly v. Municipal Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Daniel Walfish discusses the impact of the court’s decision in Lucia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm
To begin with the unhappy news (at least for petitioners), the court denied review without comment in one-time relist Kelly v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 2:18 am
Courts
SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT
NEW YORK COUNTY Torts
Failure to File, Serve Notice of Claim Against Municipality Complete Bar to Defamation Action
Flacks v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:45 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:08 am
Kelly v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:22 pm
Compensation for regulatory taking of water rights - Casitas Municipal Water District v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 12:07 pm
Kelly and Cameron W. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Kelly, [667 S.W.2d 489, 491 (Tenn. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
There’s a twofer out of the Sunshine State, Kelly v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
In the courts. 40 Envtl. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
In 2011, the state Supreme Court of Washington ruled in State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
