Search for: "Kelly v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 969
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Accordingly, we reverse in part the court of appeals and render judgment dismissing GIC’s claims against Kelly and Hofstatter for lack of personal jurisdiction.DAN KELLY AND LAURA HOFSTATTER v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:24 pm
United States (SCOTUS) (Clean Water Act jurisdiction) Return to Sender - Elvis and Notice: Jones v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 2:29 pm
United States (SCOTUS) (Clean Water Act jurisdiction) Return to Sender - Elvis and Notice: Jones v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by New Books Script
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The court relied on a recent decision from the Supreme Court of the United States, Kokesh v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
United Staffing Alliance, another ERISA case involving a claimed right to medical benefits. ** 06-1505, Meacham v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Kelly v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
Joseph Landau reviewed Peter Spiro’s book At Home in Two Countries and pondered the history of dual citizenship in the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am by Kelly Ann Bird
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
United States, must come from the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]