Search for: "Kelly v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2019, 12:31 pm by fvanloon
Mo Brooks (R-AL) gave his thoughts on a claim made by former United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley alleging then-White House chief of staff John Kelly and then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson sought to undermine the will of President Donald Trump. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:33 am by Amy Howe
United States (Jan. 14) Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 11:39 am by nmlandon
This edited volume is part of a collaboration among law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key judicial decisions in the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am by Bridget Crawford
  The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, finding that licenses were not property; Skilling v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by William Ford
Unsatisfied by her response, Nadler concluded his questioning by rather bluntly stating that the Trump administration will need to offer a more compelling argument to reauthorize the “perhaps useless” CDR program than “maybe someday it’ll do some good. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]