Search for: "Kelly v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 934
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2022, 8:50 am
Facts: This case (Riley v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the conviction and 180 month sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in United States v, Kelley Kelley was convicted after a bench trial in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
In Kelly, et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Three of those involved a question arising under Padilla v Kentucky, the 2010 United States Supreme Court case holding that it can be ineffective assistance of counsel for a criminal defense attorney to fail to advise his noncitizen client of the immigration consequences of pending criminal charges. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:00 am
United States and Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:20 pm
Cullen and Kelly A. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Moss v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Moss v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
(Kelly v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:30 am
Strangely, the lawsuit, State of Washington et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 2:56 pm
District Court, Middle District Pennsylvania, opinion, 11/21/20 The Honorable Mike Kelly v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 2:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
This two-decade trend started in 1999 with United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
"Specification 2 alleged that "on two separate occasions between January 1998 and December 1999," Wolfe "stopped two individuals and confiscated, for personal monetary gain, a quantity of United States currency. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
