Search for: "Kendall v. INS" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Blake Gray writes that “[w]ine lovers anxiously awaiting a US Supreme Court decision that could change liquor laws nationwide will have to wait another few days” for the ruling in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Kendall Racquetball Investment, Ltd., 658 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (Attorney’s fees to plaintiff were appropriate when plaintiff was determined to be a prevailing party when jury found it prevailed on a breach of contract claim but found there were no damages.); Animal Wrappers and Doggie Wrappers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Times (April 10, 2018) https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/10/mark-zuckerberg-admits-to-mistakes-but-lawyers-ins/. [read post]