Search for: "Kennard v. People" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
The majority (led by Justice Corrigan) and dissent (authored by Justice Kennard) disagree on whether there's constitutional or prejudicial error. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
Justice Joyce Kennard The California Supreme Court has ruled unanimously, in a decision written by Justice Joyce Kennard, in Benitez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
National Bank Assn.) and for the worst majority opinion (People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:00 pm
Both murders involved the fairly horrific beatings of the victims.And the convictions and death sentences of both defendants -- Keone Wallace and John Mungia -- are unanimously affirmed by the California Supreme Court.I think you get a sense of the Court's reaction to both cases from the following line of the opinion by Justice Kennard -- who's hardly a pro-death penalty fanatic -- in Wallace: "In the course of a residential burglary, defendant beat to death a frail, elderly… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Barrett (2012) 54 Cal.4th 1081, 1114-1151, and the worst opinion was Justice Kennard's opinion In re Richards (2012) 55 Cal.4th 948, with People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
Justice Kennard's opinion on this point is pretty short (five double-spaced pages) and worth a quick read. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:22 pm
We know from the Supreme Court's opinion in Florida v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:30 am
Come on.For this reason, I'm somewhat sympathetic to Justice Kennard's dissent. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
"Sure, that dissent was written by Justice Kennard. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
(Justice Kennard once held a similar view, but recently backtracked on it. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
Just report to the cops that they're driving drunk or have a gun and watch the guns-drawn fun.The fact that everyone agrees on the result here doesn't mean there's substantial agreement, and Justice Kennard writes a separate concurrence, as does Justice Werdegar (joined by Justice Moreno), to explain their disagreement with many of the arguments adopted by the majority. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Justice Kennard interjected that a key fact in this case is that the people who complained are "not just potential witnesses but percipient witnesses" with knowledge of a defect. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
  Allegedly looking for other victims or other people in the house. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
Justice Moreno, joined by Justices Kennard and Werdegar, dissent.Lest my (necessarily abbreviated) description suffice, here's the basic point of the dissent: "Stripped to its essence, what the majority holds is that the challenge 'Where are you from? [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]