Search for: "Kennedy v. State Personnel Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Often town councils and boards act as administrative tribunals in a quasi-adjudicatory capacity, hearing personnel grievances or land-use appeals. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board might require ALJs to be removable at will, throwing into doubt much of the administrative state’s legitimacy. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB) held in the case of Williams v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:31 am
State Rep. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Board of Ed. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
Davis and Personnel Director v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
” It posited the following series of events: “A school board president announces at a school board meeting that the board has lifted pandemic-era restrictions on public schools,” and, later, “at a backyard barbecue with friends whose children attend public schools,” shares the identical information. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Crutchfield has no Ohio personnel or facilities. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Office of Personnel Management and Windsor v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
Office of Personnel Management and Windsor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:24 am
Perry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
Office of Personnel Management and Perry v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Chapter 124, then the state personnel board of review shall make an investigation. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:55 am
Humphries, and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
Chapter 124, then the state personnel board of review shall make an investigation. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
The Court heard oral argument yesterday in Hertz Corporation v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
