Search for: "Kennedy v. The United States Courts et al" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 2:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” –Justice Kennedy, in majority opinion – OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Humanitarian Law Project et al., On June 21, although the Court reversed the Ninth Circuit in all four decisions it issued (!) [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Eurodif (07-1059) and Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am by Lyle Denniston
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
Plan Administrator, et al., United States Supreme Court, January 30, 2009; No. 07-636 [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
Kennedy et al FLSD   Other   Civil Rights Americans   with Disabilities Act   Boehm et al v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, the Court will hear argument in: Winter, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:06 am
The Court has released the opinion in Fitzgerald, et vir v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Bennett, et al., seeks to rely in part on the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in January in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
American Civil Liberties Union, et al. (08-565). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:18 am by Kali Borkoski
United States, Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion for the Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:11 pm by Trey Childress
Related posts: Another ATS Case Seeking Supreme Court Review New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed United States Supreme Court to Again Consider the Alien Tort Statute [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]