Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 221 - 240 of 622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm by CJLF Staff
United States, previously noted here, is now available as a podcast.The speakers are John Elwood, who argued the case for Elonis in the Supreme Court, and CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger, who wrote an amicus brief supporting the government. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by CJLF Staff
CJLF's legal director, Kent Scheidegger, was a recent guest on KFI's "The John and Ken Show" discussing the death penalty. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty, Margaret Drew at the Human Rights at Home Blog, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences (in three posts), and Angus Johnston at Student Activism. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger anticipates the Court’s decision in Elonis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and Lisa Soronen at the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 1:05 pm by Bill Otis
  Details are at this site.Arguing for abolition are Diann Rust-Tierney of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and Barry Scheck of the Innocence Project.Arguing against are C&C's No. 1 blogger Kent Scheidegger, and Prof. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:08 am by Kent Scheidegger
 [Discusses another case and makes the DPIC neutrality claim]About 19 minutes in:Rehm:  Kent Scheidegger, what about the number of people who are on death row or who have already suffered the death penalty and been found not guilty.Scheidegger:  Let's go back and look at the answer to your question earlier about Debra Milke. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the case comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences and Mark Joseph Stern at Slate. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  Other commentary on yesterday’s grants comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Chris Kieser of the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, and Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Monday’s grant of review in Montgomery v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 10:52 am by Rick Garnett
At the Crime and Consequences blog, which is a project of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, there is a post by Kent Scheidegger called "The Theocracy Brief," which takes issue with the amicus brief filed by the National Catholic Reporter in Glossip v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes the amicus brief that the National Catholic Reporter filed in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger summarizes the criminal cases in that sitting. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
Burwell, comes from Noah Feldman in his column for Bloomberg View, Kent Scheidegger for Crime and Consequences, Mark Miller at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Todd Haugh in a podcast for the Northwestern University Law Review’s online edition, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog (Hasen also had a shorter post earlier in the day), Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Brianne Gorod at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, and the blog… [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:38 am by CJLF Staff
The Federalist Society has this podcast by CJLF's Legal Director Kent Scheidegger on the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
  I published my Plain English preview of the case yesterday at this blog, while in his Sidebar column for The New York Times Adam Liptak looks at the standing issue in the case and Kent Scheidegger does the same at Crime and Consequences. [read post]