Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 261 - 280 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 1:25 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Indeed, the statute specifically states that "The presiding judge shall not name the judge who requests the Court of Inquiry to preside over the Court of Inquiry," a point made by Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes a lighter look at Missud v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, California, said that in 2015 the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:08 am by Steve Hall
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation and an outspoken capital punishment supporter, said most of the costs of a death penalty case come from "exhaustive investigation" of the defendant's background and should be cut out. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director and general counsel for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which favors capital punishment and opposes expansion of criminal rights, said he had hoped the court would explain its reasoning in its case-by-case review of the stay requests. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am by Amy Howe
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger previews next week’s argument in White v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
” Other reports come from Kent Scheidegger at C&C Blog and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm by Amanda Rice
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to what he describes as Emily Bazelon’s New York Times Magazine “hit piece” on Justice Alito (which James featured in Monday’s round-up). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
At the Crime and Consequences Blog, Kent Scheidegger discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Cullen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on Wearry v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Conor McEvily
Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, and the Associated Press. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, with commentary from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences (who also weighs in on the ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:43 am by Conor McEvily
  Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences, Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy, and the Associated Press all have coverage of the decision. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
”  And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the controversy over the naming of George Mason’s law school for Scalia. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the summary decisions. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Monday’s grant of review in Montgomery v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am by Adam Chandler
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger explains why Ryan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on another summary reversal in a habeas case. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice, David Boyle at Boyle’s Laws, Kathleen Parker in an op-ed for The Washington Post, and the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal , which writes that “the accusation is too distant, too disputed and too late in the day. [read post]