Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 41 - 60 of 622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has compiled the 20 amicus briefs urging the court to review City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:18 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kent Scheidegger (Criminal Justice Legal Foundation) has posted Tinkering With the Machinery of Death: Lessons From a Failure of Judicial Activism (Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the case of Stephen Michael West, whose request for a stay of execution and cert petition challenging Tennessee’s lethal-injection protocol were denied without comment last week. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 11:22 am by Michael Rushford
  To address the larger question, The Federalist Society Review is publishing a point-counterpoint discussion on mass incarceration featuring Fordham University Law Professor John Pfaff, author of Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration--and How to Achieve Real Reform, and Kent Scheidegger, Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Michael Rushford
  CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger said that the bill will go nowhere, citing polls indicating that most Americans do not want to abolish capital punishment. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
"] Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation has the story, which he graciously allowed me to reprint. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the court’s decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that “[a] broad attack on supervised release revocations would indeed be a grave concern,” and that although “[t]he direct effects of [yester]day’s decision are not severe, … future developments warrant monitoring. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 pm by Michael Rushford
  CJLF Delivers Oral Argument in the 9th Circuit:  CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger presented  oral argument before an en banc panel of the 9th Circuit today in the murder case of Ezzard Ellis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
11 May 2019, 4:52 am by SHG
“The case for the death penalty is the moral part of it,” said Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, an organization in Sacramento that favors the death penalty and supported a ballot initiative in 2016 in which voters approved fast-tracking executions. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the majority opinion comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, who writes that it contains “the strongest statement of the unquestionable constitutionality of capital punishment that I have ever seen in an opinion of the Court. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the case comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, here and here. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Kent Scheidegger discusses all yesterday’s grants at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:28 pm by Michael Rushford
  In an interview earlier this month CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger told the Bee that the governor's clemency powers are designed to correct individual cases of injustice. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm by Michael Rushford
"These orders are blatant violations of the Prison Litigation Reform Act," said CJLF's Legal Director Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
’” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, who asserts that the decision “confirm[s] that the state was right on the question that everyone thought the case was about — whether inability to remember the crime alone exempted a murderer from execution. [read post]